Punishment
and Technology.
As
Pepe Reina nodded his head in the direction of James Perch on Sunday,
I nodded mine in the direction of the table I was leaning on. What
was Reina thinking? He really ought to have known better, and I won't
argue that he shouldn't have been sent off, because it was a clear
red card offence; if an opposing player did that to one of our
players, I would have been furious with him.
As
my forehead hit the table, I laughingly thought to myself that I had
probably did more damage to myself in that action than our keeper had
done to Mr Perch with his 'head-butt'.
Reina
was punished for his rush of blood to the head. What of Perch? He got
a yellow card, but from what I can tell, that was for the foul on
Reina which sparked the outburst. It is hard to really tell if there
was any contact made, if there was it was minimal and didn’t
warrant Perch reacting in the way he did.
Perch
held his face and hit the floor in such a way that if you didn’t
see the whole incident, you might have thought that Reina had
actually made full contact with Perch's nose using his fist.
Perch's
only intention in his response to air breezing across his face was to
get an opposition player sent off. Ignore the fact that it was a
sending off offence in the first place, but doing something with the
intention to get an opposition player booked, is cheating.
I
despise cheating. I'm sure we all do. I hate seeing any player cheat.
Man United players, Chelsea players, Liverpool players. It makes me
want to pull my hair out. Sadly, I don’t think anything will change
this climate of players trying to get other players into trouble.
I
would have liked to see an interview with James Perch after the game
and have a journalist ask him about that incident;
“So
James, how's your nose?”
“Its
fine thank you, a little bit sore.”
“Well,
from your reaction it looked like it hurt like hell, here, lets take
a look at the incident.”
At
which point a small TV would be wheeled over so they could analyse it
together. This would never happen of course, because it is putting
the player on the spot and would cause him embarrassment.
As
it currently stands, players who play-act, don't have to answer to
anyone. They may take criticism from fans, the press, and hopefully
their team-mates, but ultimately, they get away with it, leaving them
free to do it again if they wish.
The
FA have a dubious goals committee, which basically determines who has
scored the goals, which seems almost silly; a goal has been scored,
end of.
Why
isn’t there some sort of 'dubious play committee'? A panel of some
kind to dish out punishments for things that keep happening, like
they have in rugby.
Perch
had a head-butt aimed at him, but there are players who go down
holding their faces when there has been nothing aimed at them.
Occasionally, they might get a yellow card. And this will keep
happening. Same as regular old diving. Also on Sunday we saw our own
Andy Carroll choosing to go down rather than stay on his feet.
Happens in every game, often unpunished.
And
as long as players know they can pretty much get away with it, they
will keep doing it. The only way to try to get rid of it is if the FA
take proper action.
Bans.
Points Deductions.
Have
a committee look at 'dubious plays' and if it is certain a player has
dived or cheated in any way to gain their side an unfair advantage,
then give the player guilty of it a one match ban. When a team
accumulates a certain number of these 'dive bans', say five, then
deduct a point or two from them. I cannot imagine this idea ever
being implemented, or even getting very much support, but think of
how quickly some of this play-acting would stop.
Referees
should start doing more to stop the pushing and shoving that goes on
in the boxes during corners or free kicks. I remember one clear
incident of Carroll being helped to the ground by a Newcastle
defender on Sunday. Again, this is something that happens a dozen
times during every game, and usually goes ignored, or a free kick his
given to the defending side, who more often than not, are the ones
doing the fouling. Anywhere else on the pitch it would be a free kick
to the player being held, but in the box, the rules appear to become
hazy.
Again
it is a form of cheating. The FA really need to say to the ref’s
that they need to start giving penalties out. If a defender has his
arms around an attacking player, blow the whistle, give a penalty
every time it happens. After a ridiculous number of penalties in a
game, and with scores heading into double figures, this could well
stop.
I
also strongly believe that video technology really needs to have some
sort of introduction into football. It has been shown in a number of
other sports that it works, that it helps to keep games fair. I often
wonder why football is so reluctant to implement it. Football is
undoubtedly the most popular sport on the planet, and it makes a
fortune. It costs fans a lot of money to go to games, and the money
is obviously of uppermost importance to the football clubs
themselves.
The
people against using the technology argue that it would be time
consuming; I can see where they are coming from, I’ve watched rugby
games where the video judge has taken a couple of minutes to make a
decision on whether or not a try should be awarded. But I think that
argument is a cop-out. How many times have you been watching a game
and something happens, and within 20 seconds you have seen a replay
of that incident a couple of times? And even if it were time
consuming, is that not time well spent if it makes the difference
between a team taking zero points a game to taking three?
During
the game against Villa, we had a couple of penalty appeals, which in
another game, may have been given, and I believe one of them probably
should have been. Stop the game, have a quick look at the evidence,
make a decision.
Now,
luckily for us (or unluckily) we are not fighting for a particular
league position, as high as I would like to finish, the result we got
was not of massive importance so we would have no reason to start
screaming at the FA and their officials. If we were still in the
chase for a Champions League spot, then we could.
But
look at what happened to Wigan against Chelsea. Both Chelsea goals
were offside. Chelsea are a side who are still in with a shout of
Champions League football, and Wigan are fighting for Premiership
survival. That result was unfair, and could have been avoided if
football allowed for the video technology to be used. Who knows,
Chelsea still may have gone on and won.
How
much cash do Chelsea stand to gain if they secure that fourth spot?
How much cash do Wigan stand to lose out on if they are relegated?
Similar
could be said of the Manchester United game with QPR. Young went down
easily, won a penalty and QPR go down to 10 men for the rest of the
game. Ten seconds of review could have sorted that out better. One of
those teams is trying to win the title, the other just trying to stay
in the Premiership.
With
all the money involved in the sport, you would think the FA, UEFA and
FIFA would want to ensure the correct decisions are made every single
time. At some point over the course of a season, every singe club
benefits from, and suffers from the wrong decision being made. Some
of them won't matter in the grand scheme of things, but some of them
will, and that's what is important.